Since 2017, the state Department of Environmental Quality and a Pacific Seafood processing facility in Charleston, Oregon, a small fishing harbor close to Coos Bay on the southern Oregon coast where the fishing industry has operated for generations, have formalized an agreement for the installation of a wastewater treatment system. The year is now 2026. There is no installation of the system.
The facility’s wastewater, which includes “detritus from them filleting the fish and other seafood that they process,” according to DEQ compliance and enforcement manager Erin Saylor, has been leaking into Oregon waterways against the company’s permits. On April 23, 2026, the Oregon DEQ fined that Charleston factory $2.9 million, the second-highest civil penalty in the agency’s history. This amount was added to two additional Pacific Seafood facilities’ fines, for a total of $3.2 million. In response, Pacific Seafood described the state agency as “out of control.”
Examining the Charleston penalty’s math is relevant since DEQ’s method of calculation reveals something about their idea of what went wrong. Pacific Seafood was expected to have benefited economically from not installing the wastewater treatment system by $2.4 million of the $2.9 million total.
This is a particular enforcement strategy: a business can save money on the initial investment and running costs of the necessary equipment by avoiding regulatory compliance. That money was spent by rivals who followed the same rules. By charging Pacific Seafood the amount it saved at the expense of processors who complied with the regulations, the penalty is intended to recoup what the state defines as a competitive advantage gained through non-compliance.
At least in part, the story is complicated by Pacific Seafood’s public reaction. According to a statement released by the company, DEQ notified them in March 2026, five years after the application was submitted, that the agency was just starting to prepare a new wastewater permit for the Charleston facility, which the company had requested for in 2021. The company claims that it lacked engineering standards to create a compliance treatment system in the absence of definitive permit limitations. If true, this complaint is not implausible.
When designing large industrial infrastructure, it is necessary to understand the performance requirements that the system must fulfill. The design cannot be completed if the regulator has not established these requirements. Although DEQ argued that other seafood processors had installed compliant systems and that Pacific Seafood has had nearly nine years to do the same, the agency did not provide a thorough response to this particular argument in its initial public reporting.
The other two fines, $104,800 against BioOregon Protein in Warrenton for releasing more chlorine into the Columbia River than allowed limits and $114,000 against the Brookings facility for oil, grease, and other pollutants, are structurally simpler: they represent documented permit violations at facilities with established permit limits, finalized.
Charleston alone is covered by the “unclear permit standards” claim; the other locations are not. In public remarks that are currently accessible, the business did not assert that it lacked guidance at Warrenton or Brookings. The facts are less disputed and those sanctions are less severe.
Reading the conflicting accounts of this nine-year dispute gives the impression that the situation has elements of both a company that is actually running out of time to fulfill its compliance obligations and a regulator that, on at least one particular point, seems to have contributed to the delay by taking five years to start drafting a permit after it was applied for.

It is unclear from the available record if Pacific Seafood’s description of DEQ as “out of control” accurately depicts the situation or if it is the type of rhetorical escalation that businesses use when confronted with enforcement measures they are unable to otherwise avoid. It is evident that, despite an agreement to the contrary, fish parts have been entering Oregon waterways since 2017.
